Samsung Gear Live review

The best Android Wear smartwatch on least until the Moto 360 arrives
Wareable is reader-powered. If you click through using links on the site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Learn more
Samsung Gear Live
By Samsung
Ultimately, if you’re picking a winner between the first two Android Wear entrants, you have to side with Sammy’s smartwatch. While not perfect, the Gear Live gives a much more rounded wearable experience, presented in a better chassis and via a superior display. It’s far from perfect but, for just £10 more at £169, it’s obvious to us which Android Wear debutant early adopters should pick – at least until the Moto 360 arrives, that is.

  • Super AMOLED pixel power
  • Extra health features
  • Sleek design
  • Early adopter geek points
  • Terrible battery life
  • Heart rate monitor not accurate
  • Slow charging
  • Only 13 official watch faces

The Samsung Gear Live isn't the Korean giant's first foray into the smartwatch arena but it could be its most significant as, unlike the Gears that have gone before, the Gear Live comes with Google's newest OS on board – Android Wear.

Essential reading: Samsung Gear S2 review

As one of only three confirmed Android Wear devices – along with the LG G Watch and the Moto 360 (which has yet to go on sale) – there's obviously a lot of attention being laid at the door of the Gear Live, but does it live up to the hype? Is Android Wear a big hit and is the Samsung Gear Live the pick of the Google smartwatch bunch?

Read on to find out.

Samsung Gear Live: Design and build

If you liked the design of the Samsung Gear 2 Neo then you're in for a treat with the Samsung Gear Live. Yep, it's pretty much identical save for the different position of the physical button (at the side rather than down the bottom) and the lack of an infrared LED.

There's also not a speaker built into the Gear Live, you can dictate to your smartwatch but there are no Dick Tracey-style calling options just yet.

Back to the design and it's a rubber strap – featuring a clasp that is a major improvement from the monstrosity of the company's previous smartwatches – that seamlessly blends into the brushed metal frame that houses the bezel and the display. It's not the most gorgeous bit of tech we've ever encountered – far from it – but it is a far more elegant design than LG's G Watch.

Samsung Gear Live review

The watch strap itself is interchangeable with any standard 22mm one, although it'd be a more fiddly affair to switch to a new strap than with the G Watch as you'll need a mini screwdriver.

The Samsung Gear Live is a tiny bit lighter than the G Watch and a smidgen thinner too – not that you'd notice on when it's sitting on your arm. It's a comfortable smartwatch to wear, the back is slightly curved and it sits nicely on the wrist.

It's also around 15% lighter than the Samsung Gear 2 as it doesn't include a built-in camera – which is a good thing we say.

Samsung Gear Live: Fitness tracking

The first bit of one-upmanship for the Samsung Gear Live over its rival in the LG corner is the inclusion of a heart rate monitor on the back of the device. But don't get too excited as it's seemingly an inferior sensor to the Gear Fit and the Gear 2. Readings varied greatly and the results were a far cry from the accuracy of something like Garmin's heart rate monitor.

The other fitness feature built in is the Android Wear step counter; which is also nowhere near as accurate as a dedicated activity tracker such as the Misfit Shine or the Fitbit Flex. These two shortfalls put the Samsung way behind the current status quo of fitness devices, bad news for runners and walkers.

The Gear Live is IP67 certified meaning it's both dust and water resistant. It should survive a shower or two, although there's no way you should be swimming with it on.

Samsung Gear Live: Display

Samsung wins again (at least, until the curved loveliness of the Moto 360 arrives) with a superior screen – a 320 x 320, 1.63-inch, Super AMOLED panel that sings from the device. It's the same you'll find on the Gear 2.

The colours are nice and bright and the notifications look good thanks to the 278 pixels per inch count. However, like the G Watch it's fairly shoddy under bright sunlight.

See also: LG G Watch v Samsung Gear Live: what are the differences?

Like the smartphones of yesteryear the Gear Live does suffer from the big bezel blues. There's a fair few millimetres around the edges that we'd have loved to see used for display purposes. Mind you, the battery life is bad enough already…but more on that later.

Samsung Gear Live: Hardware

You'll be hard pushed to find any differences between the two Korean Android Wear debutants. The Gear Live, like the LG G Watch, has an engine room consisting of a 1.2GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 processor and 512MB of RAM.

Just like the G Watch, that is plenty enough of processing power for Android Wear – you won't find any app that'll make it lag or stutter. It's a very minimal system.

There's 4GB of storage on board, which doesn't sound much, but you're not going to fill it up because Android Wear apps are predominantly installed onto your smartphone and only small files are directly installed onto your smartwatch.

Samsung Gear Live: Smartphone pairing

Android Wear, unlike its smartphone brethren, is still very much a vanilla OS experience, meaning that manufacturers haven't been able to tweak the UI and offer up different skins on the early devices. And that means that the user experience between the LG G Watch and the Samsung Gear Live is pretty much identical; which is not surprising given the near duplicate spec sheets.

So, just as with the LG G Watch, Samsung's smartwatch has three core elements; relayed smartphone notifications, Google Now and voice search.

Samsung Gear Live review

The companion Android smartphone app plays a big part of the Android Wear experience. Pairing up your watch to your phone using Bluetooth is a doddle, and you can then manage what notifications appear on your smartwatch and what are the default apps for specific instructions. For example, you can set Evernote to be your recorder of choice when you say, “ok Google, take a note."

We paired our Gear Live review sample with a HTC One (M8) with no bother at all. One of the great things about Android Wear is that it's manufacturer agnostic, so the smartwatches will play nicely with any Android device. That sets the Gear Live apart from its older siblings as the Tizen-powered Gear devices would only pair with certain Samsung handsets.

Samsung Gear Live: Notifications, search and Google Now

Once paired and you'll start to see notifications appearing from a wide range of apps installed on your smartphone incoming texts, WhatsApp messages, tweets, Facebook updates, emails, game alerts and more.

Your notifications are presented in card style, with updates from the same app nicely stacked – it's very much the Google Now experience that you're used to from your smartphone on a smaller screen. You can simply swipe up and down to go through your alerts, with a left swipe providing a more info and a right swipe dismissing them.

It's a system that works okay in the most part, although you will often find that you're not entirely sure where you're navigating to – it's not as clear as a smartphone notification centre, that's for sure. However, that's a cross-device Android Wear issue rather than one unique to the Samsung Gear Live and we had no trouble getting our review model to recognise our swipe gestures at all.

Google Now is the driving force behind the second major element of the Android Wear platform and if you've used the service on your Android smartphone, you know what to expect. Expect to see traffic updates, football scores, news headlines, meeting reminders, weather forecasts and more popping up on your Gear Live's screen.

These Google Now updates can seem a little random but this is not an issue unique to the Gear Live – the same randomness of updates is also something we noticed on the G Watch as well. We think the potential of Google Now is definitely more exciting than its current worth. It's a platform that will only become stronger and more intuitive over time.

Samsung Gear Live: Voice commands

The third element of the Android Wear experience is the voice interaction. You're going to have to get used to talking to your watch if you're to get the most out of the new platform.

Voice actions, like on Google Glass, are started with an “Ok Google", followed by an instruction: “remind me….send a text….take a note….navigate to" and so on. You can also just ask a question and be presented with a Google Now style result card featuring information from the web.

On the Gear Live the voice command functions worked just as well as we found they did on the G Watch with only a few hiccups every now and again.

Samsung Gear Live review

Unlike the G Watch, there is a physical power button on the Gear Live, which is handy if you want to power down to save battery (something you might have to get used to doing), and it's also an easy way to wake up your display from the low-light standby mode without moving your arm.

The standard Android Wear method to activate the display and get your smartwatch to listen to your voice commands is to lift your arm as if you were looking at the time. We had some issues with the LG G Watch with this method but we're happy to say it's a lot more reliable on Samsung's device.

Samsung Gear Live: Battery life

At just 300mAh we weren't expecting much but, even so, we'd hoped that it wouldn't be quite as poor as it is. With what we'd consider normal usage – checking notifications during the day, reading the odd Google Now update and occasionally controlling Spotify tracks – you can expect to leave the house in the morning fully charged and be in desperate need of a plug socket by around 9pm. Not great at all.

And it isn't just a plug socket that you'll need. Like most wearable tech devices, the Gear Live requires the use of a separate charging accessory, in this case an awkward little bit of plastic that clips on the back and packs a Micro USB slot for juicing up.

We also noticed that it takes a lot longer to get the Gear Live up to 100% when charging (around 2 hours) than the G Watch, although this is slightly irrelevant if you're likely to charge it overnight.

How we test

Paul Lamkin


Wareable Media Group co-CEO Paul launched Wareable with James Stables in 2014, after working for a variety of the UK's biggest and best consumer tech publications including Pocket-lint, Forbes, Electric Pig, Tech Digest, What Laptop, T3 and has been a judge for the TechRadar Awards. 

Prior to founding Wareable, and subsequently The Ambient, he was the senior editor of MSN Tech and has written for a range of publications.

Related stories