Moto 360 Sport review

The second Android Wear smartwatch with GPS put to the test

The Moto 360 Sport was announced alongside the 2nd generation Moto 360, but we've had to wait a little longer to get our hands on it.

As you probably guessed from the name, the 360 Sport is a sportier version of the Motorola's latest Android Wear smartwatch, and is firmly aimed at those who like to get active, with its dedicated running app and built in GPS connectivity the headline-grabbing features.

The Moto 360 Sport is only the second Android Wear watch to feature GPS, following last year's Sony SmartWatch 3.

Wareable verdict: Moto 360 2015 edition review

On paper then, it's an exciting prospect but what's it like to live with? Wareable has had one strapped on for the last couple of weeks, so here's our 360 Sport verdict.

Moto 360 Sport: Design and build

Moto 360 Sport review

The Moto 360 Sport is no Tag Heuer Connected. Let's get that out of the way now. In fact, as looks go, the Moto 360 Sport falls well behind the Fossil Q Founder, the LG Watch Urbane and the Huawei Watch. Heck, even the Asus ZenWatch 2 looks nicer when paired with a suit and jacket.

But that's not exactly what Motorola is going for here. It doesn't want people to swap their dressy timepiece for the Sport. It's aiming at the sort of people who wear a digital Adidas watch, or one of those retro-looking Casios, but want a few more features.

Overhaul: Android Wear 2.0 update for your smartwatch

Just like its GPS rival, the original Sony Smartwatch 3, the Moto 360 Sport boasts a single-structure silicone case and band. Unlike Sony's effort, however, the strap isn't swappable. You're stuck with whatever colour you choose – orange, black or white.

Whatever colour you opt for, you'll get a strap that boasts a special UV coating to help fend off sweat, and features air vents at the side, like most GPS running watches, to keep your wrists cool while on the move.

You'll also get a strap that picks up dust and fluff like no other smartwatch we've come across. The black version, that we've used, is the most guilty of this grimy crime (as you can see in the pictures). Luckily, the Moto 360 Sport is IP67 water resistant, so you can give it a quick splash every now and again to clean it off.

Smartwatch showdown: Moto 360 2 vs Samsung Gear S2

The Sport edition is a tad thicker than the 11.4mm waistline of the new Moto 360 2, measuring in at 11.5mm thick and weighing 54g. The diameter of the front of the Sport is 45mm, which sits it in between the two new 360 models. It feels solid, tight, much like a regular digital wristwatch would.

The standby / action dial button has been moved to the 1 o'clock position and the back is a hard plastic one, that covers the heart rate sensor (more on that later). All in all, it's a super comfy, super compact device that definitely feels more sports watch than smartwatch, on the wrist at least.

Moto 360 Sport: Hybrid display

Moto 360 Sport review

Motorola is making big noises about the display on the 360 Sport, claiming it's a world's first for the new hybrid tech. Labelled 'AnyLight', the 1.37-inch LCD display is naturally adaptable, with the idea being that it can be nicely backlit in dim lighting situations, as per any Android Wear smartwatch. It also means it's easily readable due to the natural reflective tech when out and about in sunnier conditions.

Essential reading: Top smartwatches on sale now

We're pleased to report that in practice, the theory stands up. Android Wear is a better prospect all round, not just on the 360 Sport, thanks to the always-on, black and white mode that was introduced in late 2015. The 360 Sport takes it a bit further though by switching between its two modes as soon as it detects that it's bright. As a result the screen is always easy to read, although it's not as punchy as an AMOLED display when indoors and backlit. Like the 42mm Moto 360 2, the display's resolution is 360 x 325, with a 263ppi count.

The flat tyre is still there. Sorry, we should have perhaps mentioned that sooner. However, on this instance we'll forgive Motorola as it's more important, on a sports watch, to keep the bezel trim and the ambient light sensors working as they should. It's still flippin' annoying though – especially when using apps designed for a full 360-degree experience.

The LCD display is covered in Corning Gorilla Glass 3, so it can handle a bit of rough and tumble on the fly. However, the glass is slightly curved and indented at the edges. This causes a slight warping of the edge of the display with pixels looking distorted. It's only a problem if you look really closely but it's still not ideal.

Moto 360 Sport: GPS and running features

Moto 360 Sport review

The inclusion of GPS connectivity means users can go running, using running apps, such as Endomondo, Ghost Racer and RunKeeper, without needing to carry their smartphones with them. In theory, at least. While those apps now technically support tether-free smartwatch standalone running, they are buggy as hell and more often than not result in inaccurate measurements – mainly due to the sessions starting before the GPS is locked in

A much safer option, and the one Motorola wants you to use, is the built-in Moto Body software. Built in on the watch, you'll need to add the app to your Android smartphone. Unfortunately, there's no iPhone option just yet.

Moto Body will also track lifestyle activities and keep tabs of calorie burn, steps and so on and the smartphone platform is okayish. It's not as comprehensive as Fitbit or Jawbone, but it's easy to use and nicely presented.

While running you can swipe through various screens, showing basic metrics on distance, pace and heart rate data. You can free run, or set yourself various goals to achieve. But it's not a Garmin Forerunner. You're not going to get stats on cadence, VO2 max and the like. It's basic running stats for basic running.

But it's accurate. Super accurate. Compared to an Adidas miCoach Smart Run (which this writer has used for several organised distance runs), the 360 Sport was always within 100m on distances over 8km. Its GPS lock was also much quicker than the Smart Run. Usually it'd find a satellite within a minute.

Same run recorded on the 360 Sport and an Adidas Smart Run

The heart rate readings weren't as accurate though. Resting heart rate, when sitting still, is fine but once you work up a sweat and get your heart pumping fast, the 360 Sport is all over the place (we tested against a MyZone chest strap). This isn't unique to Moto's smartwatch yet. We've yet to find a reliable Android Wear device for bpm training.

Other fitness apps such as Fitbit, Strava and the like are supported – but the Moto 360 Sport is really a one trick sport pony. And that sport is running. We're told cycling features will be added soon, but there's nothing for pedal fans to get excited about yet. Or indeed gym bunnies. A more apt name might have been the Moto 360 Run.

Moto 360: Android Wear performance

Moto 360 Sport review

This is the boring part of the review. Yes, the Moto 360 Sport is an Android Wear smartwatch and, as such, we should give you our verdict on how Google's wearable OS performs on it. Prepare yourself for a big shock… it's more or less the same as it is on every other AW device.

Sure, manufacturers can tweak their watch faces and built-in apps but, essentially, you're getting the same feature set you'd get with even the oldest of Android Wear devices. It's a feature set that's always evolving – Wi-Fi connectivity, Bluetooth music functions, new gestures and whatever else Google introduced in the latest updates – but it's a feature set that's pretty standard nonetheless.

Essential reading: Android Wear super guide

Moto has added a few nice widgets to its homescreens, we'll give them that, with the default Sport face offering a range of customisation options. But on the whole, it's Android Wear as vanilla as you'd get from a whole host of other devices.

Whether that's a good thing or not is personal preference. Some people love Android Wear, some people are still not sure about it and some people down right hate it. What's clear is that, until Google takes the shackles off, Android Wear is pretty much a uniform experience – albeit with minor tweaks – across the range.

It's compatible with iOS, like all the new Android Wear smartwatches, but you'll be limited in what you can do. Check out our iOS / Android Wear guide for more info on what you will and will not be able to do.

The hardware – a 1.2GHz quad-core Qualcomm CPU with 512MB of RAM and 4GB of storage – is pretty much the norm for Android Wear now, and performance isn't an issue. You won't see any lag or experience any stuttering apps.

Moto 360: Battery life and charging

The Moto 360 Sport packs a 300mAh battery, which is good for a full day's regular use. Turn on GPS, however, and it will take a hammering. Saying that, we've had the 360 Sport fully charged in the morning, used it throughout the day, gone for a GPS tracked run of around an hour, and still had enough juice to last until bed time.

Moto 360 Sport
Wareable may get a commission

We've measured the battery impact of GPS tracking a few times now and an hour's run will use about 25-30% of the battery. That's with the always-on monochrome stats screen always firing. We managed to do a 45-minute run on just 12% battery, but the watch was automatically turning the display off (while still tracking in the background) every few seconds.

Charging is done using a docking station, as with all the other Moto 360s, with a nice progression graphic showing your charged percentage.

Moto 360 Sport
By Motorola
The Moto 360 Sport isn’t a dedicated sports watch. In fact, the only sport it supports is running. And, if you want in-depth running metrics, you’re going to be disappointed. However, if you’re looking to dip your toes in the murky smartwatch waters, and at the same time require an accurate running watch assistant for basic distance and time stats, it could be just the ticket. It’s well priced, well built and is discreet enough to look like a regular sporty timepiece. It’s not spectacular by any stretch but, pound-for-pound, this may well be the strongest Android Wear contender so far.

  • Accurate GPS tracking
  • Display easy to read outdoors
  • Reasonable price
  • Comfortable, compact design
  • Strap attracts dust and fluff
  • No iOS Moto Body app
  • Display warps at the edges
  • Heart rate accuracy issues

What do you think?

Reply to
Your comment


  • VinceP·

    Thanks for review! Do you know if it's possible to pair this with a BLE chest strap heart rate monitor? This would be a good way to work around the poor built-in monitor.

    • ori·


      did you get an answer? is it possible to connect a strap?

  • alexvdlinden·

    What can you say about the quality/reliability audio Bluetooth connection while running? I typically listen to music while running. I read different opinions about this.

  • exxxpresso·

    Hi, if I buy it, I would not use the build-in sports app. My idea is to use the Runtastic App instead (or maybe any other).

    Does anyone has some experience with 3rd party sports apps on Moto 360 Sport?

    • Jack4144·

      Runtastic dosent need any wareable to run...

  • GDawg·

    Just been on my first run with this, and unfortunately my worst fears were realised. The Bluetooth connection is appalling. I was using a set of brand new Skullcandy Smokin Bud 2 In-Ear buds which work flawlessly with my Sony SW3.
    This is such a shame as the GPS etc on the Moto 360 Sport is bang on.
    If anyone has a fix for this issue, or perhaps can recommend a set of headphones that do work it would be much appreciated.

    • j.stables·

      Can't speak for a fix, but have encountered similar issues with other devices. Hope this doesn't sound patronisingly obvious, but check where the Bluetooth sensor on your headphones is located, and make sure that the watch is on that side of your body. With TomTom Spark I had to wear it on my right arm, which felt unnatural, because my Jabra headphones put the Bluetooth chip near the right ear.

  • neamton·

    I've had this watch for a day and the dust collection on the wristband is so bad, I'm returning it. The heart-rate monitor is a joke and the GPS is crazy inaccurate. I was so stoked for this watch, but it simply doesn't deliver

  • onurich01·

    The device failed (began reset/rebooting repeatedly) after 17 days of ownership. Motorola would not replace with new device because it was outside of the 14 day return window. The customer service from this company is horrible. I would not purchase a Motorola or Lenovo product again. They took what was a good product, and made it worthless.

  • Cleanup1243·

    I have had the Moto 360 for a couple weeks now and so far it has been good.  The review is fairly accurate.  I chose the Moto 360 after a failed attempt at the TomTom Spark Cardio and the discomfort from the Microsoft Band 2.  The Bluetooth and stand alone music works well.  Spotty at times but they have never really had any issues with my beats BT headphones.  if I use the GPS with the music for a run the watch usually restarts at the end of the run and I will loose some of my activity tracking..... I pause the music before I end the run and that seems to avoid the issue.  

    The calories burned also is completely off most of the time.  I went for a two mile run and burned over 8,000 calories.  As much as I would like that to be true, it is safe to assume that the calorie tracking is horribly off.  Even on a typical day I don't go for a run or workout it still says I have burned over 3,000 calories.  I am an old fatbody now and probably don't burn that many calories walking around for my 7,000-10,000 steps.... 

    I don't have as much trouble with the HR as you described in this.  Only when I do interval training is the HR monitor a little wonky.  I have found that if the watch is on too tight though the HR will read poorly. Otherwise I think the readings are fairly accurate.  

    The activity tracker is also a little stingy. It won't pick up steps when I am pushing a grocery cart or holding my kid or bags with the hand that has the watch.  

    The review is absolutely spot on though, this is only good for going for a run outdoors and not really worth much else to include interval training, running on a treadmill, cycling, or lifting weights.  The smart watch features work phenomenally well though... This watch is more smartwatch then sport watch so keep that in mind when considering this product.  

    I would like to see this product improve with warmup and cool down portion to the activity and to expand their workouts that are supported to help with interval training and running on a treadmill if it is only going to stick with working well with running.  

  • ndbecker·

    Will I get updates of Android Wear direct from Google, or am I dependent on Motorola to update if/when they feel like it?

  • CoachG·

    If the strap breaks, you are hosed because it is non-replaceable.