LG Watch Sport review

A superb model to show off the new Android Wear 2.0
Wareable is reader-powered. If you click through using links on the site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Learn more

(We first tested the LG Watch Sport at the start of 2017. Since then we've spent more time with it and added our thoughts on how it holds up and compares to newer devices - scroll down for our long-term verdict)

The LG Watch Sport ushered in the new era of Android Wear 2.0, and was the flagship device of Google's revamped smartwatch launch. Together with the LG Watch Style, they represent the purest vision of what Android Wear should be.

But it's becoming a busy place. In Fall 2017, a deluge of new devices is set to land from the likes of Fossil, Michael Kors and Guess, all boasting the same basic operating system. And while few can match the full range of specs and features of the LG Watch Sport, it's under threat from the superior design of these new pretenders.

But once you're over the excitement of Android Wear's new tricks, just how good is the LG Watch Sport itself? Here's the verdict.

LG Watch Sport: Design


Chunky yet funky – that's how I rate the Sport on looks. With a 14.2mm-thick case that's 51mm tall, it's hefty, and won't have Fossil worried. Normally I wouldn't wear a watch this big, but I like the shape of the Sport, even if I still think it could do with slimming down a fair bit. I reviewed the grey titanium, but there's also a blue version that will only be available on the Google Store.

If you do find it too big then your only other option right now is the Style, which is sadly stripped of many of the features that make the Sport a good standalone smartwatch.

Where's mine: Android Wear 2.0 update for existing smartwatches

Unlike the Style, on the Sport the antenna extends into the strap, which means it only fits proprietary, non-changeable, bands. These are rigidly angled inwards, but while I found this a little annoying on the Asus ZenWatch 3, I see its merits for heart rate tracking on the Sport and generally making the watch feel snug on the wrist while exercising.

Looking at the screen: the Sport's 1.38-inch P-OLED display, 480 x 480 resolution, is sharp and even on sunny days I've never had to push the brightness up to full. Pixel for pixel (348ppi) it's the best Wear display so far. That said, it collects more fingerprints in a day than US border control does in a week; the LG Watch Sport is a total smudge magnet.


At least with its fancy digital crown you'll be doing a little less screen swiping. That's right – Wear 2.0 supports rotational input, and the Sport comes with a digital crown just like the Apple Watch. I'm sure we'll see plenty of manufacturers taking advantage of this very soon. You also have a button either side of the Sport's crown, and each opens an app of your choosing. By default the top one takes you to the workout menu, which I've kept, but I changed the bottom one to activate Android Pay, and if you're using Google's payment service you'll certainly want it to be easily accessible – unless you want to be that person holding up the queue.

Flip the watch over and you've got a PPG heart rate monitor on the back, as you'd expect in 2017 from a smartwatch that prides itself on fitness. More on that later.

LG Watch Sport: Features and fitness


Let's talk a bit more about that crown. Scrolling up while on the watch face will pull up your notifications, but tap the crown once to bring up the menu and you can also whizz up and down through the apps. I find this a more intuitive way of navigating than the Apple Watch's circle app menu, and in fact Apple's dock navigator. You'll still be tapping on apps and options to select them, but the crown just makes the whole experience feel a bit more elegant. Faster, too.

Swipe your finger left or right and you'll open the face navigator where you can scroll along the different designs. Don't see one you like? Scroll to the end and you'll be able to add another.

With GPS and a heart rate monitor built into the watch, the Sport is well equipped as a fitness device. It also performs pretty well for the most part. When measuring heart rate from a still position, it tends to take a little longer than the Apple Watch Series 2 to get a reading, but it's more often accurate, while the Apple Watch tends to dance about a bit before landing on a realistic number.

When it comes to running with the Sport, it also does an OK job, but as with most wrist heart rate monitors it doesn't stack up to the chest strap. I put it up against the Wahoo Tickr X, one of our highest performing chest straps, and the readings at the end for both average and peak heart rate were close, but as ever it's when you're hitting the higher intensities that things become uneven.

GPS performs fine, but this isn't for serious athletes. If you don't want to jeopardize distance, we'd recommend going for one of Garmin's offerings or something from TomTom. That said, against the Apple Watch Series 2's GPS the LG Watch Sport kept up well.

One thing Google talked about when it first revealed Android Wear 2.0 was a feature that would detect when you're running or cycling, and automatically open up an app like Strava that would start tracking your workout – all without you having to touch the screen. Google ended up killing that idea, as it found it could be a nuisance in certain situations (like running for a bus). There is a feature for detecting strength training movements, but really I find it's easier to just tap the one I'm doing manually. Speaking of which, there are quite a few gym exercises you can use the Sport for, from push-ups to squats, and I've found the sensors to be good at keeping tally (it sometimes jumped an extra count, but rarely).

I also tried the Sport out on a treadmill. Google Fit takes your GPS data from outdoor runs (along with height info) to calibrate your stride length, and thus, hopefully, get a more accurate reading when you're on the belt. Like a lot of people, my stride length is a little different on the treadmill (shorter in my case), and that caused the Sport to end up counting an extra .01 or .02 mile on the end of a run. However, it felt like a negligible difference.

Really though, the fitness features will only get better with more third parties jumping aboard. The ability for Android Wear to run apps straight from the watch means companies like Strava and Runkeeper have the opportunity to do more than before.

Google tells me that Play Music will soon allow streaming over the watch, but this wasn't working for the testing period. The company also said it's working with other streaming service partners for support later in the year, so hopefully a more complete Spotify app isn't far off. For the time being, you've got 2.35GB of storage on the Sport to play with, if you want to put music straight on the watch. (There's the standard 4GB of storage that you always get with Wear, but the OS takes up a fair chunk of this).

LG Watch Sport: Android Wear 2.0 and Pay


I'm not going to give a full review of the new software here – head over to our Android Wear 2.0 guide for all the ins and outs – but the new OS is a big part of what makes the LG Sport great. It's, faster, slicker and more independent than Google's first attempt at an OS; like Apple with watchOS3, Google has listened, taken stock, and returned with an update that makes much more sense for wearables.

It's the speediest Android Wear experience I've had on a watch, and this may be partly down to the update, and partly down to the fact it's running on a 1.1GHz Snapdragon Wear 2100 chipset with 768 MB of RAM. That's a little more RAM than the Style, and for the most part it's been really zippy. There has been the odd time where things froze or quickly stuttered, but we've been using an unreleased build of Wear 2.0, so we'll need some time with the finished product before we can be sure everything is running smoothly.

With GPS, NFC and LTE support, the Sport gives you a much more complete Android Wear 2.0 experience than the Style, which lacks all three of those features. For that reason it's a much better showcase for the update, and clearly the flagship of the two – although it's $100 dearer at $349.

Read next: The best smartwatches to buy 2017

Another feature we're getting on Wear 2.0, previously seen on the Apple Watch, is complications, which show up as little circles on the screen. Watch face makers will be able to include space for these in their designs, and although only a few apps are supported right now, I expect we'll see plenty more once Android Wear 2.0 is properly out the door.

Google gave me access to a few third-party apps in beta, and I've been trying out different complications as well as some of the new faces. For example, with Foursquare you can add a complication that shows you the nearest good place for coffee, or there's one for food if you'd prefer.


The untethered Android 2.0 experience is really good on the Sport, and with LTE, NFC and GPS, there have been times I've left the house without my phone without worrying about losing contact with others. You can buy the Sport with or without the SIM card, but if you do opt for cellular then you can share your number from your phone. This means you can also make and take calls on the Sport, which works fine enough if you're comfortable doing the Dick Tracy thing.

However, the best moment came when I realised I could now use Android Pay without my phone – and it works great. With just a tap of a button and a raise of the wrist I'd paid for my shopping (and still managed to draw questions from intrigued cashiers).

Hold down the crown and you'll bring up Google Assistant, which you'll already be familiar with if you're using a Pixel phone. Assistant is essentially Google Now 2.0 and is designed to be more contextual, with running conversations between you and the AI. It works the same on Wear, although you'll need to tap the crown between each question. For example, ask "What is the capital of Brazil?" and it will tell you Brasília, but your follow-up question doesn't need the added context for Google to understand. It can be simply, "And what's the biggest city?", and Assistant will tell you "São Paulo".

LG Watch Sport: Battery life


Truth be told, I've been using the Sport for a week and I'm still working out the balance with battery life from the 430mAh pack. With basic use, I can get a couple of days of power. When I went running with GPS switched on, or had a particularly intense session on the Play Store, I needed a recharge after a day.

It's not great, but unless you're opting for a hybrid smartwatch right now, you're not going to do much better. Obviously with the Sport running GPS and cellular data away from the phone, it's going to suck more battery juice than other Wear 2.0-running smartwatches. You'll also get more battery if you're using the Sport without a SIM inside.

LG Watch Sport: The long-term view


A review isn't just about how much a device has improved on what came before it, but how it fares against other options. The LG Watch Sport came at a time where Android Wear was flagging - like, really flagging. The new software felt so far ahead, and even now Android Wear 2.0 is enjoyable to use on the right wearables.

But here's the problem: the LG Watch Sport was a showcase of all the amazing things an Android Wear smartwatch could do - Android Pay, GPS, heart rate, rotating crown, a standalone cellular connection - all in one package. And right now that still seems to be the case, even though we've seen so many better looking Android Wear watches this year - and much stronger offerings from the non-Google competition.

At the time I said I thought the LG Watch Sport was too big, and if anything I feel like I was too generous, but then again, the landscape was a little different. We've seen much better, slimmer smartwatches since from Huawei, Samsung, and of course the Fossil Group. When I went back to using the Sport recently, that bulky profile stood out more than ever.

Which might be more forgivable if the fitness features were better. GPS and heart rate perform OK but you're going to get better performance from something from Garmin, or even the Fitbit Ionic. Android Wear's fitness apps are also very thin, so if that's something you care about there's a good chance you'll be looking through the Play Store for Strava's app or Runkeeper's. In fact, the Apple Watch's fitness ecosystem, while not perfect, has become much stronger, especially with watchOS 4 and the Series 3. Samsung's is better too, and Garmin's still offers some of the best sports tracking, all of which leaves Android Wear dragging behind.


LG and Google did get the head start on Apple with LTE, yes, but at the expense of bulk. However the Watch Sport is still nice and fast to use, which makes the tetherless experience better, and the use of the digital crown for rotational control is something we've not seen enough of since. Take away the size of it, and the Watch Sport is still a great reference design of what Android Wear should be about, and it's a shame that some tech companies have stepped away from Wear this past year. At the same time Fossil has stepped in and only put the design of the Watch Sport further to shame, but many of those watches also lack features found in LG's wearable.

The Huawei Watch 2 comes close to packing in as many tools, but falters in other aspects. Right now, if it's a sports watch you're after, you're better looking to the Garmin Fenix 5, Vivoactive 3, which have arrived since, or Polar M600 if Android Wear is a must-have. If you want a nice looking Android Wear watch, the LG Watch Style is more up your alley.

The LG Watch Sport is still a powerful Android Wear smartwatch and still an impressive one in some ways. As we close out 2017, LG may have fallen far behind on style, but as far as smartwatches go, none other is celebrating the potential of Android Wear in quite the same way.

LG Watch Sport
As hefty as it is, the LG Watch Sport is the best showcase for Android Wear 2.0. It has fitness chops and is packed with other standalone features that make it feel truly independent from your phone. This is what Android needed at the time, and we said it was the best Android Wear smartwatch around. It's a shame we haven't seen something since that celebrates Android Wear in quite the same way.

  • The full untethered experience
  • Super zippy, intuitive design
  • Solid fitness features
  • Chunky case
  • Smudge magnet
  • Battery still a pain

Related stories