Swim tracker accuracy not good enough for serious swimmers says study

Researchers cite detection accuracy as a key problem
21280-original
Wareable is reader-powered. If you click through using links on the site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Learn more

Listen up Michael Phelps wannabes, the current crop of swim trackers are not up to the task for hardcore swimmers according to a recent study.

Researchers at the National University of Ireland in Galway found that swim-friendly wearables are actually only cut out for recreational swimmers. They cited inconsistency of stroke counts and issues around the ability to recognise different stroke types.

Read this: The best waterproof fitness trackers ranked and rated

Senior study author Gearoid O Laighin and his team used the Finis Swimsense and Garmin Swim trackers, which are admittedly some of the older dedicated swim devices available.

The two trackers were tested by strapping them both to 10 national competitive swimmers (five men and five women) for 60 laps of swimming. Swimmers performed intervals of the butterfly, backstroke, breaststroke and frontcrawl and accuracy comparisons were made with underwater video recordings.

The results...

Both devices managed to identify the different swim strokes, with the Garmin Swim managing a 95.4% accuracy for overall sensitivity and the Swimsense managing 96.4%. They both overestimated stroke counts though apart from the butterfly. Breaststroke offered the lowest accuracy of all strokes.

In terms of distance tracked, the Garmin wearable was three laps short while the Swimsense counted correctly but varied within strokes. For lap intervals, the beginning and end of an interval didn't always prove accurate, which in turn can have a negative influence on other aspects like stroke rate, length and average speed.


While the research team believes the two trackers were pretty good at monitoring pool action, it does suggest improvements on feature detection algorithms, specifically for lap time and stroke count to make them more suitable for competitive settings.

It's a bit of a shame the Apple Watch Series 2 and newer Garmin devices like the Vivoactive HR and the Fenix 3 HR were not in the testing mix. But it's perhaps not all that surprising that we're talking about algorithms here as we have seen with fitness trackers and questionable step counting.

When we tested the Swim back in 2014, we were pretty impressed with it but this study does shed more light that wearables whether on land or water, still have a bit of an accuracy problem.

Source: Reuters via PLOS ONE

WareableSwim tracker accuracy not good enough for serious swimmers says study




How we test



Michael Sawh

By

Michael Sawh has been covering the wearable tech industry since the very first Fitbit landed back in 2011. Previously the resident wearable tech expert at Trusted Reviews, he also marshaled the features section of T3.com.

He also regularly contributed to T3 magazine when they needed someone to talk about fitness trackers, running watches, headphones, tablets, and phones.

Michael writes for GQ, Wired, Coach Mag, Metro, MSN, BBC Focus, Stuff, TechRadar and has made several appearances on the BBC Travel Show to talk all things tech. 

Michael is a lover of all things sports and fitness-tech related, clocking up over 15 marathons and has put in serious hours in the pool all in the name of testing every fitness wearable going. Expect to see him with a minimum of two wearables at any given time.


Related stories