Garmin Vivosmart 5 vs. Fitbit Charge 5
We compare these two big-name trackers
Garmin Vivosmart 5 sees Garmin make a surprise return to the fitness tracking band game, hoping to find a place on your wrist over other big-name activity tracking bands.
One such rival is Fitbit Charge 5. Fitbit's flagship band has been out a little bit longer than Vivosmart 5, but if you're in the market for a band-style tracker instead of a smartwatch, these could be two of your best options.
- Full reviews: Garmin Vivosmart 5 review | Fitbit Charge 5 review
We've spent plenty of testing time with both to help you get a good sense of how these bands compare and where the biggest wins and losses lie.
If you want a fitness tracker and are looking at Charge 5 and Vivosmart 5 as options, here's how the two match up.
Pricing
Let's talk about how much these trackers cost before we get deeper into those comparisons.
You pay around the same amount for the two if you're in the US, but Charge 5 can appear pricier than Vivosmart 5 in other territories, including the UK.
Check below for the latest deals:
Design and screen
If you're big into looks, then these trackers do offer distinctly different designs. We'd say Charge 5 is the nicer of the bands, but there are reasons you might opt for Vivosmart 5 instead.
Garmin's tracker is slimmer, with a silicone strap that can be removed and replaced with another one of Garmin's official straps to mix up that look. It's undeniably the sportier-looking of the two, but it's light, comfortable to wear day and night, and didn't cause any irritations to wear. The watch-style buckle means it doesn't budge either.
Vivosmart 5 features a monochrome OLED touchscreen display, which is nicely responsive and offers good visibility indoors and in bright outdoor light. There's also a physical button below to wake up the screen, which makes it nicer to get to sub-menus on the tracker.
Flipping over to Charge 5, you're getting something that's still pretty svelte with a sleek aluminum case that comes in three color options. The band is removable too, and you've got a vaster array of strap styles to match up with Charge 5 compared to what's on offer with Vivosmart 5.
Fitbit doesn't offer any physical buttons, but it does offer a lovely, crisp AMOLED display that can be set to always-on, which you may end up doing based on the not-so-responsive raise-to-wake gesture support.
If you care about dunking them in water, both offer water resistance ratings up to 50 meters depth, making them suitable for pool swims and showering.
We'd say Charge 5 is the more attractive thanks to the sleeker overall look and the fact that you've got a much nicer AMOLED color screen. Where Vivosmart 5 betters Charge 5 in our eyes is the physical controls and the slimmer body, making it a less intrusive band to wear for sleep.
Health and sports tracking
Both trackers promise to track health, daily activity, and sleep, and even prove useful on a run or in a HIIT session.
We'd say that Charge 5 offers more in the way of health insights and delivers solid activity and sleep tracking.
Vivosmart 5 offers more motivating activity tracking features, and good sports tracking despite the lack of some key tracking sensors.
With Charge 5, there's a 3-axis accelerometer to track steps, activity, and detect sleep with insights like sleep stages, sleeping heart rate, and sleep scores on offer. There's an altimeter sensor to measure elevation (floors climbed), which you don't get on Vivosmart 5.
You're also getting Fitbit's PurePulse optical heart rate sensor to measure heart rate continuously and during exercise. There are also red and infrared sensors to enable SpO2 monitoring during sleep.
Vivosmart 5 also uses an accelerometer to enable step tracking, and some indoor sports tracking, and is used to detect sleep.
There's Garmin's Elevate heart rate sensor to measure heart rate continuously and during exercise, and to unlock features like stress tracking and help fuel features like Garmin's Body Battery energy monitor. It also includes a Pulse Ox sensor to deliver continuous blood oxygen monitoring, or if you just want to track it during sleep.
Activity and sleep tracking
As daily activity trackers, we'd say Charge 5 offers a strong experience, making stats easy to absorb both on the band and in the companion Fitbit phone app. It offers good accuracy for steps and a 24/7 heart rate. We'd say the same about Vivosmart 5, but it offers a little more motivation with its adaptive step counts and Move Bar.
The Garmin Connect app is certainly a lot busier, so if you value a more intuitive companion app, it's Fitbit for us.
Both offer automatic sleep tracking, promising similar types of data and insights into your sleep. Both break down sleep stages, including REM sleep time, and generate sleep scores.
They can both track blood oxygen levels and heart rate during the night, while Garmin also offers the ability to track respiration rate as well.
We'd say the Fitbit sleep tracking overall is more accurate, in terms of capturing the correct sleep duration, with Garmin usually an hour out in comparison.
The presentation of the data and the insights offered by Fitbit feel more useful here as well—and the Health Metrics dashboard is a great way to get an overview of your health. With Garmin, that information is buried, and the presentation of the data means you have to do more interpretation.
Sports tracking
While these trackers aren't primarily built for tracking sport and exercise, they do offer features to help you do that.
Charge 5 has built-in GPS to track outdoor activities like running and cycling, while Vivosmart 5 can use the GPS from your phone to track similar activities.
On Fitbit, you're getting 20 exercise modes with automatic exercise recognition support for core activities like running, walking, and pool swimming. On the software front, there are features like workout intensity maps and Active Zone Minutes.
You also get Fitbit's new Daily Readiness scores, which are based on activity tracking, heart rate variability measurements, and most recent sleep. It's a similar feature to Garmin's Body Battery monitor, which works similarly, but as we've mentioned, is presented in a more engaging and easy-to-understand way.
There's also the Cardio Fitness score (basically VO2 Max under a different guise).
Vivosmart 5 has plenty of sports profiles too, including support for treadmill runs and strength training with automatic rep counting. You can see VO2 Max estimates and view your Fitness Age, and you can broadcast HR over ANT+ to supported fitness equipment.
We'd say sports tracking isn't either of these trackers' biggest strengths. GPS accuracy was good, but not the most accurate you'll find on a tracker. You'll get similar results for indoor tracking and activities like pool swimming as well.
Heart rate performance is good for steady workouts, but will struggle at high intensity, and those small screens can make it hard to really absorb data on the move. If you want GPS, then it's Charge 5, but if you're happy to take your phone out with you, Garmin should do the job of tracking outdoor time, too.
We'd say it's pretty level-pegged in this department, but we'd just side with Fitbit because of those extra sensors and the benefit of having a larger, color display.
Advanced metrics
Vivosmart and Charge 5 both offer health-tracking features, but it's clear that if you want more serious insights, it's the Fitbit tracker you want.
That's because, along with the sensors already mentioned, it also includes an ECG sensor to deliver more accurate heart rate trend readings and to help assess the heart for potential atrial fibrillation. That said, we should warn you that the ECG feature is intended for wellness monitoring and shouldn't be considered a medical diagnosis.
The SpO2 sensor will also look for variations in blood oxygen during sleep, which may be a sign of sleep apnea. Sadly, this requires a Fitbit Premium subscription.
It also includes a temperature sensor, which monitors skin temperature during the night and looks for deviations and changes from your baseline. It's not regulatory approved, but we found it useful enough to indicate when we might not be feeling great or becoming unwell.
Outside of physical health, it offers plenty in the way of helping you take care of your mental well-being, too. It can generate stress scores based on sleep, exertion, and heart rate variability data. There's an electrodermal activity sensor (EDA), which also measures stress responses, and there's a raft of mindfulness features inside the Fitbit companion app, although we found this much less useful.
Garmin's health features don't carry any sort of regulatory approval to offer serious health insights, but you can track your heart rate 24/7 with good accuracy, there's stress tracking offered as well, and there are Garmin's relaxation reminders, which are linked to its breathwork modes.
If you want better health tracking, though, it's Fitbit you want.
That being said, many of those insights, as well as some of the well-being features, are locked behind Fitbit's Premium subscription. All of the data in Garmin's Connect app is free to access, so that's something to keep in mind here.
Smartwatch features
They might have slender screens, but these trackers can play smartwatches, and we'd say Charge 5 does a much better job of it overall. Features-wise, you're getting the ability to view notifications from apps, calls, and view calendar appointments.
Android users can reply to some notifications using default and custom replies. You've got contactless payments via Fitbit Pay, but unlike Charge 4, there are no longer onboard music controls. The big factor here, though, is that you have a color screen to view and use those features on.
In contrast, Vivosmart 5 also offers notification support, includes music controls, views weather forecasts, lets you change watch faces, and now includes the ability to view calendar appointments. There's no payment support or access to Garmin's Connect IQ Store.
The smartwatch experience on Garmin isn't terrible, and it makes good use of the screen it has available. Features like weather and calendar appointments are well optimized, for instance. Ultimately, though, that color screen and slightly bigger screen estate make Charge 5 feel more useful as a smartwatch. If that's something you value, that's the one you want.
Battery life
These aren't fitness trackers that are going to last for weeks and months, but they do have the capacity to get you through a good week's worth of tracking.
Vivosmart 5 is good for 7 days, but using the Pulse Ox sensor continuously knocks that down to about 3 days.
Charge 5 offers up to 7 days, too, but in our testing, it was more like 5-6 days. GPS use will noticeably eat into the battery life, and switching to the always-on display mode will see that week drop to around 3–4 days.
So there are features on both that can be noticeable drains on battery performance, but you're looking at two trackers that can run for around a week before you need to grab that charger.
Which should you buy?
So we've given you our take on what these two fitness trackers can do and how they performed in our testing.
By and large, we feel that Charge 5 offers the best mix of features in the most stylish package. And there's no trade-off for battery life either.
Buy Fitbit Charge 5 if you want a good-looking tracker with a bright color screen and a mix of fitness tracking, strong sleep tracking, and big health features. It also offers a richer, more enjoyable smartwatch experience compared to Vivosmart 5.
Buy Garmin Vivosmart 5 if you want strong, motivating fitness tracking features in a slim, comfortable band. Ultimately, it's fans of Garmin, or those that want to invest in the Garmin Connect ecosystem and dodge the extra expense of Fitbit Premium, that are best suited to Vivosmart 5.
