Best sports watch 2018: Top GPS watches for running, cycling and swimming

Whatever your needs, check out our selection of top running watches

Deciding on the best sports watch for you is an extremely personal choice. Each one offers a different selection of running and performance data, some of which is aimed at beginner runners who want to keep things simple, and others at athletes that want to get scientific about their training.

But what makes the perfect running watch? Well, accurate GPS is a given these days, but now the focus is on biometric data. Most running watches have heart rate sensors built in, and the ability to connect a chest strap as well, for really intense sessions.

And what does that heart rate data do? Aside from giving you the chance to tailor your sessions to specific heart rate zones, heart rate data can offer insights into VO2 Max (a great measure of your fitness), as well as gauge the effectiveness of a training session.

Many watches now put a focus on recovery, which can help stave off injury. Using heart rate variability data, top running watches will suggest the amount of rest you need, as well as assessing how your body is adapting to your session.

Finally, some top-end devices also look for information about your running form – assessing data like steps per minute (cadence) and the form of your body.

We've highlighted our top picks below, but also followed up with other devices that have impressed during our tests and that might suit different budgets and preferences. Got any questions? Let us know in the comments section below.

Best sports watches

Top pick: Garmin Vivoactive 3

Feature check: Multisport modes | GPS | Optical heart rate | Garmin Pay | Smartwatch notifications | Water resistant to 50m

The Garmin Vivoactive 3 really does do it all. Run, bike, pool swim, golf, walk, row, SUP (paddle board) ski, XC ski, run indoor, bike indoor, walk indoor and row indoor – it's a formidable sports watch for those who don't define themselves as runners or cyclists.

Smartwatch-style notifications and the ability to read emails and messages are the order of the day, and of course, the built-in heart rate monitor makes for much richer data, especially from niche sports. Yes, it's a bit of a jack-of-all-trades, but it's one of the best sports watches out there, as long as you don't expect maximum detail in your results.

Along with a significantly slimmer and more attractive round watch design, the Vivoactive 3 also adds the ability to make payments from the wrist with Garmin Pay. So while it's now a better running watch than the Vivoactive HR, it also does a better job at being a smartwatch alternative.

In-depth: Our full Garmin Vivoactive 3 review

From $299.99, | Amazon

Garmin Vivoactive 3
Wareable may get a commission

Garmin Forerunner 935

Feature check: Multisport modes | GPS | Optical heart rate | VO2 Max analysis | Smartwatch notifications | Garmin Connect IQ | Water resistant to 50m

Our new top running watch and rightful winner of the Sports Watch of the Year accolade at this year's Wareable Tech Awards costs a fair bit more than our last reigning champ, but we think the Forerunner 935 is well worth that extra spend if you want the best that's out there.

It's primarily designed for triathletes, but it takes the best of the new tracking skills packed into the Fenix 5 and puts it into a smaller body.

Sitting at the top of the Forerunner family, above the Forerunner 735XT and Forerunner 235 watches, it'll record most forms of running including trail sessions, includes a heart rate sensor and will dish out data to give you an insight into the effects of your training.

It's also compatible with Garmin's new Running Dynamics Pod, which delivers six running dynamics including cadence, ground contact time, stride length and more. Heart rate monitoring is by no means perfect, but it's come on leaps and bounds in terms of accuracy since Garmin first started putting optical sensors inside of its watches.

We should also talk about the battery life. Bottom-line, It's one of the best performers we've tried and can manage a couple of weeks if you're not hammering marathon distances everyday. We love running with it and we think you will too.

Check out our full Garmin Forerunner 935 review

Current price: $499.99

Garmin Forerunner 935
Wareable may get a commission

Polar V800

Feature check: Multisport modes | GPS | Advanced data | HR via a chest strap only | Requires footpod for cadence | Water resistant to 50m

The perfect training timepiece for swim-bike-runners, the Polar V800 tracks everything you do on two wheels or two feet, in the water or on dry land. Pace, distance, fat burn calories and max heart rate are all covered on super-clear screens that are brilliantly customisable.

Pair it up with a Polar H7 or new H10 heart rate monitor and you can also unlock the V800's zonal training smarts, making sure you're sweating it out to achieve the right effect.

Hook it up to a shoe pod and it'll also give you cadence, stride length and other insights to help hone your Mo Farah running form. Wannabe Wiggos can also opt for a range of cycle accessories to increase the stats haul from two-wheeled training.

What it reveals while you work out is one thing, but this smartwatch keeps giving long after you've sunk your post-workout protein shake. The Recovery Status and Orthostatic Test features predict when you'll be ready to train again. There's also a running program that adapts if you can't fit in a run and includes exercise routines to aid recovery. V800 also doubles as an activity tracker and lets you see whether your daily calorie burn comes from just being alive, workouts or general activity. While it might be a bit of an oldie, Polar continues to support it with software updates including better Strava and GoPro integration. It's a beast of a running watch, but it still delivers the goods.

Definitive verdict: Polar V800 review

Current price: $499.95

Polar V800
Wareable may get a commission

Garmin Fenix 5

Feature check: Multisport modes | GPS | Optical heart rate | VO2 Max | Garmin Connect IQ | Smartwatch notifications | Water resistant to 50m

Joining the slimmer, more female-friendly Fenix 5S and the hulking Fenix 5X, the Fenix 5 once again reigns supreme, packing in the usual fix of advanced running metrics as well as some new ones.

Aside from the bog standard data we've come to expect from Garmin's run-friendly watches, it includes every data metric going, with Training Effect scores after every workout, recommended rest periods, Training Status (whether you're improving, maintaining or declining in fitness) and resting heart rate, logged over the day and week. It's also inheriting stress tracking and rep counting features from the Vivosmart 3 fitness tracker to keep a closer eye on even more elements of your health and fitness regime.

It also builds in a optical heart rate sensor, which isn't quite gold standard and might still persuade you to pair a chest strap for more reliable heart rate readings in HIIT workouts.

The list of tracked sports is equally mind-boggling, and if you find it too chunky, try the all-new, slimmer, Garmin Fenix 5S.

In-depth verdict: Garmin Fenix 5 review | Garmin Fenix 5S review

Current price: $599.99

Garmin Fenix 5
Wareable may get a commission

TomTom Adventurer

Feature check: Multisport modes | GPS | Optical heart rate | Route guidance | Water resistant to 50m

With a dedicated trail running mode (alongside road running, hiking, skiing and open workouts), the TomTom Adventurer is a great option for those who like to run off the beaten track.

Altitude and elevation are tracked in trail mode and you can access a live compass, which is great when you're running with only fields in every direction.

But most useful is the ability to add and follow GPX routes, which can help you get into the wild without getting lost. Just plot a route using a service such as Strava and then upload it via the TomTom Sports app on your PC or Mac. Then follow the line so you won't get lost. A great excuse for ditching your normal routes and getting your trainers dirty.

Full test: TomTom Adventurer review

Current price: $349.99

TomTom Adventuer
Wareable may get a commission

Suunto Spartan Trainer Wrist HR

Feature check: Multisport modes | GPS | Optical heart rate | Water resistant to 50m

The Suunto Spartan Trainer Wrist HR benefits from a smaller, slimmer body than previous efforts from the Finnish company. It's still big on sports tracking modes, has an optical heart rate sensor, water resistant and swim friendly and boasts a decent battery life.

But it's the price that attracts. At sub-$300 watch runners, cyclists, triathletes, swimmers and outdoor lovers are making a saving on rivals and few watches that can offer these features for this price.

It's not quite as brilliant as the Garmin Fenix 5S at a similar size, but at this price, many will forgive the shortcomings.

$279, | Amazon

Suunto Spartan Trainer Wrist Trainer
Wareable may get a commission

Apple Watch Series 3

Feature check: Multisport modes | GPS | Optical heart rate | Water resistant to 50m | Smartwatch skills | LTE | Apple Pay

Hold on a second – yes this smartwatch might seem like the odd one out among this selection of sporting power houses, but it's none too shabby. Third party apps like Strava make it a decent watch, it has multisport tracking built in (not to the standard of rivals) but it's a great training companion.

Using Wi-Fi signals around you, the Apple Watch 3 will lock onto GPS immediately, so no waiting around in the cold for a satellite lock. Apple Music playlist syncing is ridiculously easy, and you can pay for a drink with Apple Pay when you're done. What's more, the addition of LTE means streaming tunes on the go, and you can make a call on long runs, which adds that level of personal safety.

While you'll want to opt for third-party apps (Workout is still data-light for runners), the heart rate sensor stood up well to the rigours of testing. It's far from perfect, but still capable of returning useful data, training within zones, and getting feedback on HIIT sessions.

Read in full: Apple Watch Series 3 review

From: $399.99

Apple Watch Series 3
Wareable may get a commission

Best basic running watches

TomTom Spark 3

Feature check: Multisport modes | GPS | Optical heart rate| Route guidance | Water resistant to 50m | Music playback from the wrist

Now if you don't require all the extra running metric frills or the mammoth battery life you get with the Forerunner 935, then the Spark 3 is well worth considering. Especially if you're new to running and don't want to break the bank for a watch that'll track your sessions.

Read this: Best Bluetooth headphones for running

As well as the usual running metrics (distance, speed, time), its optical heart rate monitor aced our tests, and it plugs into nearly every running app going. It'll also store MP3s, which it'll play via a pair of wireless headphones, that helps separate it from the Garmins, Polars and Suuntos of this world. The feeling of running unencumbered by your phone isn't to be underestimated.

The new version also has a Route Exploration feature, which enables you to upload GPX routes (you can quickly make one in Strava or Map My Run) and follow them from the watch. It's a nifty feature and really useful for getting out and exploring new areas.

It's not without its issues. Pairing is still a bit of a nightmare at times (we actually do this via a cable to our PC/Macs now to save blood vessels popping). But its solid stats, improved smartphone app, great heart rate sensor and extensive list of extra features earn the Spark a place on our list.

While it's not as good or comprehensive as the Garmin Fenix 5 (below), it is less than half the price and has the best wrist-based HR monitor we've tried. So for most runners the TomTom Spark 3 should fit the bill. If you want the full works (GPS, heart rate, music playback), you'll be paying above $200, but if you're willing to sacrifice some of those features you can pick it up for a less and still get a great run tracking experience.

Full test: TomTom Spark 3 review

Price start from: $129.99

TomTom Spark 3
Wareable may get a commission

Garmin Forerunner 35

Feature check: GPS | Optical heart rate | Water resistant to 50m

High-end running watch features are tumbling onto entry level devices at a terrific rate, and there's no better evidence than the Garmin Forerunner 35. Propping up the Garmin GPS watch line-up, the natural successor to the Forerunner 25 adds notifications, heart rate, all-day activity and a host of training modes.

We've put it to the test and for beginner to mid-range runners, there's no better device on the market. While it eschews the detailed sports science data offered by the Forerunner 935 and multisport modes of the Vivoactive, it tracks pace, distance, heart rate zones and time for running and cycling, and is water resistant to 5ATM.

While its $200 price tag has been usurped by the new Polar M200, we'd still opt for Garmin's budget running watch as it boasts most of the features you'll need out on your run.

If you want an even more affordable Garmin watch option, the Forerunner 30 has recently been announced and offers dedicated run features for less.

In depth: Garmin Forerunner 35 review

Current price: $199.99

Polar M600

Feature check: GPS | Optical heart rate | Android Wear

The Polar M600 is very much a Polar running watch first and Android Wear smartwatch second. It's unashamedly a fitness device, so much so that it's almost inaccurate to compare it to the current crop of smartwatches at all.

Read this: Become a better runner with Polar Flow

The first thing you'll need to do is get Polar Flow hooked up, and you can enter the company's fitness platform from a dedicated button on the watch. One push fires up the app on your phone, which is your gateway to tracking runs and workouts. GPS run tracking is on the money and the stats and metrics the excellent Flow app provide post-run make it the top smartwatch for runners.

Sweat test: Polar M600 review

Current price: $329.95

Polar M600
Wareable may get a commission

Polar M430

Feature check: GPS | Optical heart rate | Race planning

While the V800 might be the daddy of the Polar sports watches, the M430 is the feature-packed alternative that's a little kinder on the wallet.

Natural successor to the excellent M400, the M430 sticks to largely the same design adding a heart rate monitor that has vastly improved in performance since a recent update.

Read this: Become a better runner with Polar Flow

You can expect all the usual Polar frills including new overall training benefit features to get a better sense of how valuable your running session really was. It also features Polar's Running Index and Running Programs to help you build plans for races and see how your performance is developing over time.

Polar has sought to improve things on the indoor running front as well by adding an improved accelerometer motion sensor to provide more accurate treadmill tracking. If you care about accuracy, reliability and strong battery life, then the M430 comfortably ticks those boxes.

Wareable verdict: Polar M430 review

$229.95, | Amazon

Polar M430
Wareable may get a commission

Best sports watch 2018: Running, cycle, swim with Garmin, TomTom and more

Stop press: Garmin Forerunner 645M

It would be remiss of us not to mention the incoming Garmin Forerunner 645M, when advising you on picks for multisport watches. We've only had a handful of time with Garmin's new watch at CES in Las Vegas – but with the thin, sleek body of the Vivoactive 3, but with the ability to store offline music to playback on your run, it will interest music lovers.

On the sports side it tracks running, cycling, swimming and a host of multisports, as heart rate built in with all the VO2 Max skills you'd expect. However, it plays nice with iHeartRadio, Deezer, offline MP3s and Amazon Music is on the way. The company is working on other services, although nothing is concrete.

Check out our hands on Garmin Forerunner 645M review.

Shop for recommended running watches on Amazon

Polar M430
Polar M430
Garmin Forerunner 35
Garmin Forerunner 35
TomTom Spark 3
TomTom Spark 3
Garmin Forerunner 235
Garmin Forerunner 235

Wareable may get a commission


  • stpmcd says:

    How do you completely leave out the Fitbit Surge?

    • Danjames23 says:

      really? They did mention it

    • xcdcl says:

      You must have missed it. It's the sixth one listed from the top..

    • KRunner says:

      accuracy problems

  • nope303030 says:

    There is a pretty inappropriate typo in the first line of the Garmen Forerunner 15 discription.  

    • SwimMomRuns says:

      Well, your description of the typo in the text about the Garmin 15 is far worse, as "discription" is not even a real word. In the context of things, I cannot believe that was worth a comment. "Inappropriate" isn't even the best word choice for the issue at hand. It was just a word-tense issue. I read the article for a review of running watches, not because I was concerned about writing style and grammar.  

      • Mark17 says:

        Not to mention misspelling "Garmin." :)

      • xcdcl says:

        Hahaha!!! Everything about this thread is funny ;-)

  • rsmith1987 says:

    Can anyone suggest a decent entry level or all rounder that works well with Strava?  Anything up to about £150 is OK.  

    • Dominick says:

      hi, tomtom works out of the box with strava and they are great watches but lack 'return to start', I do trail running myself and need that feature so i use a suunto r. Suunto usses movescount but in the web interface you can add a connection to strava. 

      In short: know how to get home: go with tomtom, if not Go with suunto

      • Nturner says:

        I'm looking for a watch for my husband and was wondering if any or all of these watches show you your exact route and pace? He runs trails and would like to see where he was. 

  • sneffels says:

    I've had a Garmin 620 for about a year now and it's very good. I was marathon training and it's perfect for that IMHO. I just treated myself to a Garmin VivoActive and am very impressed thus far. I bike, golf, swim, and run and this thing seems to do it all. Haven't tried it for swimming yet, but have the other 3 done this week with good results. Recommended. 

  • Philippe says:

    How is the SMARTWATCH 3 working with MAPMYRUN and other swimming app? I have a SONY XPERIA phone and would like to stay within the same platform but would also like to keep all my previous records with MAPMYRUN?

  • Francis says:

    Hi ,

    Very perplexe regarding running watches. Bought the Adidas and never again. Any suggestion ? Looking into forerunner 225 or vivoactive? Love my running and biking. 

  • Rocape says:

    I've had a Garmin610 since January 2013. It has been great. It is very accurate and the touch screen is easy to use on the run. On the down side it has a pretty short battery life and sometimes it takes up to 5min to get a GPS signal. Unfortunately it stopped working October 2015 which means I only had only 2,5 years use from it. Which at $300 is pretty pathetic. Took it to Garmin Repair service who said they can't fix it. Will I buy garmin again? seems to be poorly manufactured and unreliable if it lasts for less than 3 years.

    • malcs says:

      What would you buy next? (ditto my Garmin Forerunner 10, strap came off after 2 years, and a replacement set is like 25% of the cost of the watch)

  • charlotte102 says:

    I'm not off the treadmill yet so I don't need GPS.  I am hoping to capture also the walking around and moving with a sit/stand workstation and a stationary bike  Monitoring sleeping (or lack thereof) would be nice also.  Suggestions?

    • j.stables says:

      Moov would suit you well.

  • Geooprit says:

    I'm looking to invest in a decent watch and I'm looking at buying the Garmin 620... I'd just like it to measure my speed and distance and anything else is just a bonus also I'd want to be able to wear it just as a standard watch too. Any feedback would be great thanks :D 

  • Tigs says:

    I wanted to make a correction about your comment regarding androidwear not having GPS.  I have the Samsung Gear S and not only has built-in GPS and heartrate monitor (from the wrist), but you can add a data plan and phone line to it so you can leave your phone at home.

  • kdthatsme says:

    Which is better for a runner... TomTom Cardio or Garmin 225? 

  • Wicax says:

    im using apple watch & tom2 cardio.. If marathon i just wear the tom2 coz apple watch gps need the phone its unlikely heavy.. 

    So frankly everyday i track my activity with apple watch, even for 10k practice running in the field or in the treadmill.. But when it comes to race on marathon i will use my tom2 cardio.. It's pretty good, now i can hold my run 11.5km/h from for 2 hours.. (2 months ago 10.5km/h)

    But i still want to know about vo2 max fitur? Do i need that? Do i need to buy the watch that have the vo2 fitur? Coz i still want to improve my marathon speed to 12-13km/h.. (I am 169cm & 83kg, really over heavy)

  • Espartak says:

    Hello people!

    Can you update this post? I think it is very useful, but it has to be updated often. The GPS running watches are changing like the speed of light! :)


  • Swissy says:

    I'm looking at buying my husband a GPS runners watch for Christmas and wondered which was best? He often gets lost on his adventurous runs so was thinking this would be useful. Does the GPS say the route out loud like with a normal car navigation system? Thanks, I'm totally clueless here...

    • j.stables says:

      Most don't do routes. GPS refers to tracking rather than guidance. However, Garmin devices let you set routes and the top top end ones like the Fenix 3/Epix have a compass built in to offer SOME support. But it's not quite turn-by-turn. 

    • TimHarrod says:

      @j.stables - Suunto Ambit 3 both the Peak and Sport support tracks, the app is easy to use and you can map a route with way points or just steal someone else's. Once sync'd with the watch it's easy to bring up a route and watch the scaled route and indicator arrow on your wrist to know where your going, I have successfully many times.

      Suunto are not cheap, but good things, with the higher end build quality aren't, but so so worth it.

  • Running-Dad says:

    if you want music and don't want to run with a phone, seems your only choice is a Tom tom spark. Are there any other options. Is the spark worth the cost?

    • sanmd says:

      I believe you can do the same with Sony Smartwatch 3!

  • KerriM says:

    Can I use any of these watches to track my mother in law whom has dementia while she is out on a walk with my phone?  Can I locate her?  She is in denial so I want her to think it is for fitness (which it is) but also incase she loses her way we can also loacte her.

    • tiat says:

      I need to know too.. Did you have any luck figuring it out?

    • pond83 says:

      Hi KerriM,

      Don't know if you have had any luck with this yet, but an activity tracker like Endomondo allows you to see the location of someone while they are out on their run/walk.  The app can be used on iphone/android phone and the Sony Smartwatch 3.

  • Gtpet says:


    I'm looking for the best gps watch that will also measure heart rate from the wrist and not require a strap. Any suggestions???

  • runner says:

    I bought the Garmin 620, thought it would be good. But I can't keep a signal. at first I thought it was where i lived, and just dealt with it. Till i did several races where there wasn't anything blocking the GPS. So i contacted is horrible! No they will not replace the watch and that's $420 down the drain.

    • MarathonGirl says:

      Same issue for me. Can't get or keep a signal. What a huge waste of money. Don't feel confident to buy another watch now so will just run with my trusty stop watch.

  • Minotauro says:


    What is the best fitness tracker to use in the soccer? After the game I need to analyse the player position in the field during the game and the heart rate.


  • fldude says:

    How does the Samsung Gear S2 stack up here?

  • Emansonator says:

    I'm looking for a watch that does GPS tracking, mapping, pace, elevation, HR and music. Suggestions?

  • Runner1967 says:

    4 years ago I got a Motorola; Motoactv, until today is still the most complete watch ever produced.  side by side there is no other watch that have all the functionalities:

    GPS, Radio FM, 8-16GB MP3 Player, Altimeter, bluetooth, Wifi, Cadence sensor, Power sensor (Via ANT+ Sensor) , calls alert, Texts alets, calendar Alerts. Heart rate monitor, pedometer, indoor tracking, touch screen, light sensor that adjust the screen. 

    Too bad Motorola never produced a second generation, After 4 years the battery last for a full marathon while is playing music. 

    • runner123 says:

      You are more than right. I own one for 3 years and still as the first date. I could add that you can see the screen even with direct sunlight. Best smart watch in the market. Sadly no new generation. 

  • Biggie says:

    The Garmin Fenix 3 now has an option to include the same HR monitor as the 235, DCRainmaker seems to rate it.....bit on the pricey side mind and not much availability! 

  • LauraP1 says:

    I want a decent gps running watch with heart rate monitor. Training for marathon. But I also do indoor workout & cross training so want heart rate monitor to judge my efforts & calorie burn. Is there a watch which will be awesome for running tracking but also for just heart rate only monitoring?

  • Sseman says:

    is there any that doesn't count moving arms normally and not walking. Fitbit and garman both very inaccurate counts steps when not walking 

  • ranners79 says:

    hi everyone, At the moment im using a phone with a scosche rhythm hrm on the arm but I'm not very pleased with this setup. So im looking for a GPS watch with a built in mp3 player with a non chest strap hrm.  Any ideas

  • wokkawokka says:

    You would think for "running and active" watches they would include MP3 storage to hold songs to play music with bluetooth headphones. GET IT TOGETHER ALREADY!

  • caroline12 says:

    I'm a soccer and rugby referee and want to buy a watch that will track my milage and positioning on the field during games. Is there a watch that will accurately track this for me.

  • caroline12 says:

    Hi I'm a soccer and rugby referee and am looking for a watch that will track my milage and positioning on the field during the games. Is there a watch that can accurately do both for me.

  • juliafig says:

    Hello, considering I need a watch to record: distance and HR in Running and Cycling and HR in indoor sports, with HR on the wrist and sync with the Strava, witch is the best: FR225, TT Cardio or another?

  • Kayzee says:

    I want a running watch to replace my ancient Garmin 201. My ONLY complaint with it is that it loses the satellites too much. However, it has interval training capability (I can see work distance or time/rest distance or time, number of intervals and press GO.) I can drop "breadcrumbs" to get back to my start by reverse route or directional, I can see elevation of run. I can set pace alarms. Nothing I've sermon the market does this.  I don't give a (hoot) about heart rate, stride length, Bluetooth sync or shining my shoes.  Advice?? 

  • btr1976 says:

    I want a GPS fitness tracker that tracks steps, running stats, distance, pace, calories  and other activities. I don't care about heart rate or text, phone, email alerts.  If it plays music, all the better because I don't have to have my phone with me.  What's the best option under $200? 

  • mjc154 says:

    I'm looking for a GPS watch to help train for half marathons and marathons. I currently have the Magellan echo fit and like that I'm able to use it as a remote to my smartphone. Unfortunately, I have had this watch for just over 1-yr and the battery life is weak and it has recently froze becoming non operational.  I use map my run and would like a watch that's able to be used in this manner with map my run. Anyone know of a watch similar to the Magellan echo fit?

  • Olek says:

    I saw the comment that someone wanted to buy her husband a watch Which has a navigation system like in a car. The Garmin Epix is a good one because it is an all rounder and even has GPS and glonass. The poor thing is that it looks kind of bulky and can cost up to $600

  • kitkat says:

    Which one would be best for a high school cross country runner - looking for something more on the entry level for now as a gift for my son. Also, I saw something called an Adidas Fit Smart at Amazon:  specs....

    • New - all day activity: set goals and track steps, calories and distance all day.
    • Our adidas fit smart provides visual coached guidance for workout intensity to keep you on track, motivated and training smart and effectively
    • The Fit Smart watch has an integrated accelerometer tracking pace, distance and stride
    • This sports fitness watch syncs wirelessly with miCoach train & run app
    • Fit Smart with Mio wrist based continuous heart rate technology
    • Doolie2007 says:

      Check out the TomTom Runner. Under $100. Great for high school xc runners.

  • fitnessmom says:

    I am looking for advice on which watch to get.  I run and i recently started training with a personal trainer at gym.  Which watch is best for this?  I really like the look of the Garmin Vivoactive as i can wear it throughout the day but not sure if this is the right watch to track my gym activities.  I also have been told that the Tomtom runner 2 and the Polar M400 is good.  What are your views?

  • thejone says:

    It's complete codswallop that the Fitbit surge's battery lasts a week. You;re lucky to get a day out of it, if you do any kind of GPS tracking. Their recommendations for extending battery performance means using nearly non of the features. 

    Credit to Fitbit's support staff they are amazing and are super helpful. but to advertise this tracker's battery life as 1 week is pure fantasy.

  • madsrg says:

    I just bought the new TomTom because I had the previous Nike+ watch that was made by TomTom, and was very pleased with the old one. Unfortunately I am really not happy with the new watch by TomTom :/ The button on the wrist is terrible to use. You have to push really hard for it to react, making it a pain when it is strapped on. And you have to push in the wrong direction (up to go down in menu and vice versa) and push left to go right. I wish I had started using it before my 30 day money back guarantee had expired :/ I used it today for the second time, and it froze when I switched menu while running. Main problem is the wrist button, what a terrible design.

    • iagommc says:

      Hey, i'am almost buying the Nike Sportwatch, why bought another, is the Nike Sportwatch not good anymore or something?

      • kej says:

        husband has gone through 3 of these and the Nike support is terrific, but the product does not hold up after a yr or so- maybe the sweat, but each one wouldn't link after time.  am looking at other options for him now

  • tonymahony says:

    does anyone know whether it is possible to use zombie run with any of these watches without having to cart round your phone? i know they provide phone free running. personally im really enjoying the app so would like to keep it going but im fed up of carting my phone round the arm strap annoys me immensely and im one of these runers who needs everything in place so i can concentrate on the run. 

  • Brick says:

    TomTom Spark i returned because i could not sync the data to the App on my iphone 6p. The watch Itself had some good features for the price.

  • fb_007 says:

    what is best smartwatch?

  • GMan185 says:

    I really love the concept of lactate threshold estimation in the FR630 & Fenix 3 HR. No other devices interest me without such running metrics. Does anyone know whether a movescount app and a compatible ambit 3 can do the same thing & if so does it need to be paired with a smartphone while running?

  • kurtbarker says:

    Really surprised not to see the Garmin Vivoactive HR on the list (and even more surprising to see the TomTom Spark take the lead). I've been looking for a wearable for a few months, and I read (on several sources) that the TomTom spark had really bad connectivity and syncing issues, and the music playback was very fussy (almost to the point of not being able to use it). Have you used it, if it's just from a feature list it's quite misleading. I bought my Vivoactive HR today. I still wear my phone on my arm, and the fact it has music control, and control for any app (including spotify), i'm pretty happy. It's also getting great reviews, and no complaints from me just yet.

    • j.stables says:

      I use the Spark for every run, and there are elements of truth with the fussiness of connecting headphones, although I've overcome them now and don't have any problems. Syncing has also not been a problem. Check the full review for full thoughts. The reason it's our #1 choice is mainly the accuracy of the HR and the ability to use it for music. It's liberating.

  • LCL999 says:

    TomTom Runners GPS Watch – It’s a fail – I give it 4 out of 10.

    I recently bought one of these but I’m pretty disappointed. It does not do the most basic of all tasks. It does not tell me what my time was at the end of a run! To be fair, it also has some nice features. Let me walk you through it.

    My old GPS watch is a Garmin Forerunner. It worked reasonably well but had a couple of annoying deficiencies. I can download a run to my computer using their software package and see a table of times, distances, and even altitudes for each lap, as well as the totals. But the display was not enabled for cut and paste; so to transfer the data into an Excel spreadsheet it had to be manually keyed. I expected the TomTom to be better, and it is. The TomTom’s display is also bigger and higher contrast, which is great for old eyes like mine. Also the Garmin was very slow to lock onto the satellites, the TomTom is much much quicker.

    Now as to using the TomTom. It has one big fat button which is effectively four buttons. You can select options by pressing up, down, left, or right. The screen is also sensitised so touching it usually (but not always) turns on the internal light. The UP/DOWN buttons scroll through various displays of information, the LEFT/RIGHT buttons are for selecting options and starting/stopping. A lot of the options are for “training” which means setting targets for things like time or distance or pace, or running against the times of a previous run. I have not explored these functions, but they seem to be where most of the development effort went, to the detriment of basics.

    This is the procedure to time a street run, complete with “laps” defined by various landmarks such as corners and intersections. Starting from the time-of-day clock press RIGHT. This has “RUN” as its default. Press RIGHT again. The screen now shows “Please wait” until it has a satellite fix, then it changes with a buzz to “GO”.Pressing RIGHT again starts the clock and I start running. The display shows elapsed time in nice big numerals, and I can press DOWN or UP to scroll through other info such as distance, pace etc.So far so good.

    The LAPS mode I have preset is MANUAL (The alternative lap modes are fixed times or fixed distances). Oddly, one signals the end of a lap by touching the screen, a function which normally turns the light on. As well as being non-intuitive (pressing RIGHT for lap end would be logical) the screen has a mind of its own. It can be oversensitive and will register in the bush if I brush off a cobweb or push through some foliage. Sometimes it refuses to register no matter how hard or often I tap or wipe it. This happens when I’m running in the rain and my fingers and its face are wet. Similar to the Garmin, the display shows the lap count for five or ten seconds, which for me is irrelevant and denies me the time when I passed the lap marker. Better would be the option to show lap time or total time for the ten seconds. Best would be to briefly freeze the display to whatever it had been scrolled to.

    There is no option, or no simple option, to pause the clock and then restart it. For example if one wants to exclude waiting at the lights to cross a road, or stopping to retie ones shoelaces. This should be a LEFT click to pause, RIGHT to restart; but it isn’t.

    Now comes the killer. At the end of the run there is no simple way to stop the timer, and no way at all to show the final time in big numerals. As far as I can it work out, the procedure is to press LEFT twice (pressing just once changes the display but the timer keeps running), or perhaps one long press. If I get it right, which is seldom, this brings up a symbol, two fat vertical bars like the stop symbol on a CD player. Pressing UP brings a displays in very small print five metrics of the run. Total time, distance, number of laps, pace or speed and calories. All very nice for 25 year old eyes in broad daylight, quite useless for old eyes in the gloaming. I just want to see the time I ran in big numerals to tell the registrar. My reading glasses are five minutes away locked in my car, or an hour away at home.

    It gets worse.Pressing LEFT multiple times stops the timer, but press it once too often and one gets back to the time-of-day display; and the run time is lost! Truly, the watch will not now display the time you just ran. It’s hidden inside and can be recovered when you transfer the run to a PC (or smartphone I’m told). So some hours later when I get home I can find out the time I ran. Great!

    It’s a shame really, because there is much to admire in the watch. For example; the big easy-to-read numbers (except at end-of-run), the buzz to confirm button pushing and satellite fixing, the quick time-to-fix, the excellent zoomable map of the run that comes up on my PC, the wide comfortable strap, the long battery life (you can use it as your normal day-to-day watch). From reports I read the various training options are good for those wanting such functions.

    There are some minor but forgivable annoyances. I can set the time-of-day display to 12-hour mode, but the next day it has reset back to its default 24-hour display. Times over the hour are shown as hours and minutes, with seconds in script so tiny as to be unreadable. I would love the option to omit the hours and show times all in big digits up to 99m 59s, or even better up to 999m 59s. The PC graphical display graphs altitude quite well, but the pace graph is so higgley-piggley as to be useless. It needs a better smoothing algorithm. There is an altitude number for the whole run that doesn’t match total height climbed (measured off the graph) or anything else.

    But as for, at the end of a run, seeing how long you took and how far you went, forget it.

    • j.stables says:

      One TomTom annoyance is the lack of a digest at the end of a run, but if you go the run option and press UP to the calendar icon, you can see details for the last 10 runs or so. It's a bit weird there's no summary screen automatically displayed at the end of the run, but that's how you find the details you're looking for.

  • Morg81 says:


    Bought a Garmin Vivoactive HR 10 days ago: was looking for a GPS smartwatch with an ALTIMETRE/BAROMETER: apart from the most expansive watches (Suunto and Garmin Fenix) this Vivoactive HR is the only one that includes one.

    So if you want to keep an acurate track of your elevation during your runs/rides/trails etc. this Vivoactive HR is a must.

    I'm also quite happy with the battery: almost a full week before having to charge it, with a 24/7 use including push notifications from an iPhone, 2 hours of run (GPS on) and 3 hours of working out (GPS OFF).

    The "real" test will be next October: I'll use it for 2 obstacles races (Spartan Beast and Super), we'll see if it survives these 8ich hours of effort ;-)

  • Eline says:

    Does anyone know an activity tracker with GPS that is suited for woman's wrists? My wrist measures barely 14 cm and even the garmin vivosmart is huge in comparison to my wrist.

    • j.stables says:

      Vivosmart HR+ is about as good as it gets I think. It is quite chunky. Obvs if you're willing to take a phone along Moov Now is quite dainty. Sorry, not much help.

  • JaySoprano says:

    Please does anyone have an answer to the comment by KerriM ? (Dated 25 Nov 2015)

    "Can I use any of these watches to track my mother in law whom has dementia while she is out on a walk with my phone? Can I locate her? She is in denial so I want her to think it is for fitness (which it is) but also incase she loses her way we can also loacte her"

    i have a similar problem. if its possible , which is the best for this problem? thanks.

    • SurfDog says:

      Garmin's LiveTrack lets you track activities in real time for free using Garmin Connect Mobile when you pair the app with a compatible Edge or Forerunner device. If you use iPhones, you can track someone via Apple’s “Find my friend” app. Or check out the Glympse app available for both iPhone and Android. It's specifically for tracking family members on the go.

  • yogibimbi says:

    oK, now the Apple watch Series 2 is out, the question is: how long do the other watches still have?

  • SANDEEP23 says:

    Sir can I call with  ear pin in smart watch

  • SANDEEP23 says:

    Can I listen song by  ear pin lid

  • mc24337 says:

    I've experienced almost all the problems described here. I just came back from a trip in Europe, just to find out that none of the activities I did while I was there were recorded or can be uploaded. I am wondering if more recent models of the Garmin GPS watches are any better - but at this point I am looking for alternatives and I can't really push myself to spend another $250-$300 on a Garmin, given the record. I've had a 305, which "almost died" after a run in the rain, and then died because of battery woes. The 310XT is waterproof, but has a slew of annoying issues as discussed here. I am ready for a change...

  • Joules says:


    I'm only a runner, what do I "lose" if I buy the FR35 instead of the FR235 ?

    Thanks !

  • Sgjer says:

    why did you remove garmin forerunner 235 from this article? Would you not recommend this anymore?

  • wife says:

    I want to buy a running watch for my husband as a gift. He is old and an old runner and doesn't want anything fancy. Don't need heart rate or sinking/pairing or other tracking of fitness goals other than the distance run and time. Here's what's important.

    1. Big font so he can see the watch data without changing to reading glasses

    2. GPS for location and returning from run.

    Here's the problem. We go on vacation to somewhere beautiful and go hiking. I can only hike slowly (I'm old, too) but he likes to jog ahead. There have been circumstances where we lose each other. He has also gotten lost on his own when going out on trails by himself. Number one issue is that there is easy to get info about how to get back to start point or other designated point along the path. Can you set a meeting point and have the watch direct you so that you can't get lost?

    Thank you for your assistance in choosing the appropriate watch.

  • MrsOC8 says:

    Just trying to get some input on which tracker to use. I am between Samsung Gear Fit 2 and Fitbit Charge 2. 

    Important details about me: I have a Galaxy S7 and therefore SHealth. I plan to primarily and purposefully use the tracker for running. I am an athlete, but at this time only involved in running (outside, but maybe on a treadmill if I ever get one). 

    I am also a nurse so I will likely wear it to work to include this activity (walking for 12 straight hours) as part of my overall level of activity.

    What I like/am considering: 

    On the Fitbit I love that it (supposedly) has continuous heart rate monitoring including when not involved in an activity. Alternately, I have read the Samsung only checks your HR at random infrequent intervals and if it detects you (or you manually) start an activity. 

    On the Samsung I like the GPS and music features. I think the Fitbit looks nicer on me (a small lady), but the Samsung screen is phenomenal looking with color and clarity.

    Also as a side less important question, does anyone know if the Samsung "blue" is more like teal? I can't tell online and haven't seen it in person. Does it in any way look feminine?

    Any input to any of the above-mentioned questions/musings would be helpful and appreciated. Thanks!

  • scalesonfire says:

    On which third party apps would the Apple Watch Series 2 be supported?

  • robbiebrown says:

    Not sure how the Apple Watch 2 got into the "Best" category. I purchased before Christmas for running and am returning it this weekend as not fit for purpose. 

    The Nike Running Club app is just horrendous. My Map shows me starting my run after mile 1?! There's no elevation information unless you carry your iPhone with you and the single most annoying thing is that there's no way to see if you have a lock on GPS when heading out for a run - therefore going into the unknown! 

    Highly disappointed with my watch hence why I'm returning and going back to my trusty Garmin Fenix 3HR. Sure, it has potential, but until Apple pull their finger out and actually let 3rd parties access the GPS chip its pretty useless. 

  • LBarry says:

    I am looking for a slim watch to track mileage. most I've  seen are bulky. i'm petite, slim wrists. most that come up top picks have large faces. suggestions?  thanks 

  • jansverre says:

    I have had some of the above watches. My favourite is the Garmin Forerunner 935. The 935 is meant for runners as much as for triathletes. I believe that was one of the reasons for removing XT from the model name. Some of the things love about the 935 is; super light, virtual partner, back to start, altimeter, barometer, temperature, custom and third party apps, HR, segments, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi and Ant+. I use it together with HRM Run to get full running metrix. The Garmin Connect software is also ages ahead Polar Flow. Its also easy to import and export *.gpx, *.tcx,*.fit, *.csv or *.xls

  • OscarSantiago says:

    Which one is better for someone who just like to run: Forerunner 235 or Vivoactive 3? 

    • m.sawh says:

      If you just like to run, the Forerunner 235 is a good shout and is cheaper. It also supports phone notifications if you want some smartwatch-style features

  • Tom-Bailey says:

    I’ve been using this app called Hoops Connect recently and it’s been great for finding fitness classes or sports sessions. I’m a runner myself and so it’s nice to be able to do it with other people rather than run on my own. I’ve even organised a few events myself and it went great! Here’s their website: My name on the app is Jordan Cambern if anyone wants to go for a run or try some other sport :)

What do you think?

Connect with Facebook, Twitter, or just enter your email to sign in and comment.